‘Thugocracy’ – The Real Face of Global Governance

 

The leak of 100,000+ WhatsApp messages between the UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, and his circle of advisors, has given ordinary people a unique insight into what went on behind the closed doors of government in 2020.

And it ain’t pretty.

Hancock and his circle are revealed as ‘mad monks’ on enforcing total compliance with the government’s restrictions and lockdowns.

Even Johnson, and Chancellor Sunak, are viewed as suspect in their eyes.

Another ‘hate’ figure is Sweden, the only European country to not enforce total lockdowns on its people.

At one point, Hancock snaps: “I am so sick of the “fu*king Sweden argument”.

“Supply three or four bullet points on why Sweden is wrong” he barks at aides, who presumably scurry off to do his bidding.

Another exchange involves Jeremy Farrar, a member of the government’s scientific advisory body, Sage.

Farrar had earned Hancock’s enmity by publicly questioning one of the government’s decisions in 2020.

Hancock calls for Farrar to be sacked, saying:

“We need a Jeremy Farrar handling strategy.  He is totally offside, a complete loudmouth, has little respect amongst the serious scientists.  Did he approach us before doing Ridge (a Sky News Program)?  He needs to be either inside the tent and onside, or outside and commentating.  He adds no value internally”.

Hancock’s words are telling.

Firstly, he queries whether Farrar “approached us” – ie asked for the government’s permission – before appearing on Sky News.

Secondly, he makes clear that scientists must be ‘either inside or outside the tent’.

The government’s policies are exposed as having nothing to do with ‘the Science’ and everything to do with ‘ingrouping’ and ‘outgrouping’.

Those who failed to play along, must be cast out and cancelled.

There used to be a word for this type of government – ‘thugocracy’.

Of course, on this occasion, Hancock had bitten off more than he could chew, in going after Farrar.

Sir Jeremy Farrar is not just anyone.

For starters, he’s a director of the world’s second richest Foundation, the Welcome Trust, and was recently appointed Chief Scientist to the World Health Organisation.

In 2017, he co- founded CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, with his friend Bill Gates.  He is also a long-time Agenda Contributor of the World Economic Forum and good friend of Klaus Schwab.

He is, in short, a very powerful man.

If anyone was going to be ‘cancelled’, it would be Farrar who did the cancelling.

Poor old Hancock didn’t stand a chance.

The leak of these messages is pure gold.

They deserve to be shared as widely as possible, particularly with the more trusting souls among us.

The ESG Global Protection Racket

 

ESGs act in the same way China’s social credit system does – just at the corporate level.

The whole system is little more than a mechanism for injecting a ‘collectivist’ political ideology into every company’s policy and investment decisions.

A weapon that Global Finance is using to enforce total conformity on businesses worldwide, particularly around issues such as climate change, green energy and ‘social justice’.

Any business refusing to ‘go along’, or that globalists have designated as an ‘undesirable’ business, are ‘cancelled’ by removing their ability to open a bank account, obtain loans, lines of credit and insurance.

It is not just banks either.  Giant managed funds like BlackRock, government super funds, insurers and investment trusts, are all using ESG scores to aggressively discriminate against their own customers, based on their political, cultural and religious beliefs.

In October last year, a faith-based non-profit organisation led by a former US Ambassador for Religious Freedom, had its Chase Manhattan account closed abruptly, with little explanation.

Wells Fargo, meanwhile, put a target on conservatives’ backs in 2020, when it shut down the bank accounts of Lauren Witzke, a Republican Senate candidate.

These are just two of many such cases I could cite.

The truly insidious part of ESGs, however, is that it isn’t just ‘undesirable’ companies who are being punished by lenders, insurers and fund managers, but all the smaller businesses operating along that company’s supply-chain as well.

An accountancy business that does the books for an oil company, for example, will also be assigned a low ESG credit score based on their association with that company, and their access to certain financial services/products will be restricted accordingly.

This is NOT something that MAY happen someday, ‘in the future’.

It is happening right now, and at scale.

Just ask a farmer, licensed gun dealer or mining contractor about the last time they tried to obtain a bank loan or some form of insurance, if you don’t believe me.

Are you starting to get the picture yet?

Think of ESGs as a global protection racket.  One that has all the hallmarks of those run by the Mafia in the 1930s.

One that is being sold as a benign way of measuring ‘corporate stewardship’, but which at bottom, it is just plain old criminal racketeering.

A corporate shakedown, where businesses are being forced to operate with a proverbial gun held to their heads.