,

Coming for your guns

MAKE NO MISTAKE AUSTRALIA – THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR GUNS!

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced the introduction of new laws making it illegal to buy, sell, transfer or import handguns anywhere in Canada.

‘Gun groups’ are warning of government plans to eventually ‘seize’ Canadians’ guns.

‘Fact checkers’ are saying this is ‘misinformation’, but it’s in the actual Bill!!

Public Safety Canada, a federal agency, said:

“Most owners of covered rifles will be required to surrender them to the government, via a mandatory buyback program set to begin by the end of 2022”.

IT’S UNCLEAR HOW MUCH COMPENSATION WILL BE OFFERED.

The door is left open for firearms to be “seized” from anyone who doesn’t comply with the “mandatory” buyback.

Large-capacity magazines will be banned and penalties for offences, increase substantially.

There is also a draconian new “red flag” system, that allows people to petition the court to have a person’s license revoked.

If granted, the State can ‘confiscate’ the person’s firearms immediately.

The Government says it will use the ‘red flag’ system to ‘confiscate’ the guns of “radicalised individuals”.

I think we can all see where that’s headed.

Canadian truckers and their supporters will be first cab off the rank, just watch.

At his highly staged-managed press briefing, Trudeau boasted of having banned 1,500 types of firearms in 2020, on the back of a ‘lone wolf’ shooting in Nova-Scotia.

It is crucial, Trudeau said, to “keep firearms OUT OF THE WRONG HANDS”.

Mmmm….

So guns themselves aren’t bad – just guns in the “WRONG HANDS” – aka ordinary, law-abiding citizens.

In the “RIGHT HANDS”, however, guns are all good.

That’s why Trudeau is happy to arm all those doing the State’s bidding, with as many military-grade firearms and high-powered weapons as Canadian taxpayers’ money can buy.

Something once considered far more dangerous to “the safety of Canadian citizens” than any ‘lone wolf’ shooter.

Bear in mind, Canada already has one of the strictest ‘vetting’ procedures in the world.

Gun-owners must lock guns away unloaded in a safe, with bullets stored in a different location.  They also waive all rights to warrantless searches.

Police can enter their homes unannounced and without warrant – just to “check” on you.

If you go to the gun range or to get your gun serviced, you must notify the police of the date and time.

You must tell them where you are going, the exact route you are taking – point A to point B.

None of this is about safety – it’s about control.

Australia and New Zealand gun owners have been warned.

Anything done by one ‘Five Eye Nation’, means it is ‘on the table’ for ALL.

Firearms Buy-Back Program

Further strengthening our gun control laws – Canada

 

/0 Comments/by
, ,

Weapons in Canberra

PEOPLE ARE ASKING IF THE LRAD WAS THE ONLY WEAPON “PRESENT” AT CANBERRA’S PEACEFUL PROTESTS

The ACT police have admitted LRAD sonic weapons were “present” during this week’s peaceful protests in Canberra.

The explanation given, is that the LRAD was there purely as a “communication device”.

Sounds plausible enough, but fails to explain all the mysterious injuries and symptoms hundreds of protestors are saying they experienced.

People who were there, have described symptoms ranging from feelings of disassociation and vertigo to extreme burns and blistering – even blistering inside their mouths and throats.

Medical teams treating them, were apparently at a loss to explain the phenomenon, although the ‘official explanation’ given out later was ‘bad sunburn’.

‘Sunburn’, doesn’t begin to cover the symptoms people were reporting, however, and many people I have spoken with, who were there, are firmly convinced that some kind of chemical toxin or gas was responsible.

I have no way of knowing whether that’s true or not, but one photo sent to me by someone at the protests, certainly deserves some kind of explanation from authorities.

As you can see, it shows a heavily camouflaged police officer and Police dog, guarding  two large pod-like structures close to where the crowds were gathered.

An ex-military mate I showed the photo to, said straightaway that the pods were ICB Chemical Containment Units, used for transporting and storing chemicals.

I have looked up ICB images online and they are clearly identical to the ones in the photo taken in Canberra.

That doesn’t mean that the pods in Canberra DO contain chemicals, of course.  There is simply no way to tell that from a photo.

You would think that if they DID have chemicals in them, that they would have been clearly labelled with a HAZMAT warning– which these two weren’t.

When they asked what the pods were, protestors were told they were chemicals to “put in the fountains”.

I was told this was unlikely given they were some distance from the fountains, were never put in the fountains and the amount of chemicals the pods contained would have far exceeded the amount needed to clean a fountain.

It may be there is a perfectly reasonable explanation, if so, then the government should have no problem telling the Australian public why there were two ICBs Chemical Containment Units, sitting adjacent to thousands of civilians, including young children.

If anyone else out there has any ideas on the mystery, please let me know in the comments.

Why were they there?

What was in them?

And why were they under heavy guard?

/0 Comments/by