With the COP27 climate conference in Egypt next week set to focus on the transition to ‘renewables’, some experts are warning there may not be enough land to manage a shift away from fossil fuels.

The warnings are far from misplaced.

Most people simply have no idea how much land is going to be needed to develop the gigantic utility-scale structures necessary to replace coal and gas.

Or that these industrial-scale monstrosities are not going to be put ‘out in the desert’, away from everyone, as many seem to believe.

Developers will need land that is close to transmission lines, close to a substation and close to the “load” that is being used.

They will need, in other words, huge areas of land near to the towns and cities they are supplying energy to.

The incredible loss of high-value farmland, native trees vegetation, forests and precious natural habitats this will involve is going to be catastrophic.

Here in Queensland, the message is clear.

To power the State using renewables, there will have to be a huge trade off in land use.

A HUGE trade off.

And guess who will be asked to make the biggest ‘trade-off’ of all?

You guessed it.  The same group who has always found themselves on the wrong side of ‘trade-offs’ involving land – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.

You didn’t seriously think ‘The Path to Treaty’ process was devised because Australian governments were suddenly stricken with guilt and a need to atone, did you?

Spare me.

They couldn’t even give the country’s other ‘black group’, Australian South Sea Islanders, the time of day recently, when asked to honour commitments made to them two decades ago!

So why all the crocodile tears now?

Could it be that ATSIs have something the government and their ‘stakeholder’ partners desperately want from them?

Something that other deeply disadvantaged groups like Australian South Sea Islanders, don’t have?

Such as the rights governing access to, and use of, huge tracts of the state’s land perhaps?

Surely not.

And yet… Governments, state and federal, WILL need to take back control (if only covertly) of vast areas of Aboriginal lands and waterways between now and 2030!

Not just for constructing massive amounts of new energy infrastructure, but to facilitate the thousands of new projects planned for the mining of radioactive rare earths in Queensland, a commodity the ‘new economy’ is heavily reliant on.

So, forgive my cynicism over the governments’ new virtue-signalling campaign aimed at convincing ATSIs that their government loves them and has only their best interests at heart?

And for suspecting that government bureaucrats are already hard at work drafting this new ‘Treaty’, quietly laying the groundwork for one of the biggest land grabs in the state’s history.

Convince me I’m wrong!


Under the guise of saving nature, the Albanese government has signed Australia up to one of the biggest land grabs in history.

Dubbed 30 by 30, the goal is to set aside 30 percent of Australia’s land mass within a National Reserve System by 2030.

And thirty percent is just the beginning. 

30 by 30 grew out of a thesis by the eugenicist Dr Edward O Wilson of Harvard University, who maintained that humans should occupy no more than one half of the earth – and not the best half either.

His mantra was “Nature needs half”.

The ultimate goal, therefore, is to lock away 50 percent of the earth by 2050.

For decades, Australian governments have pursued policies harmful to agriculture and a productive economy.

30 by 30 will take this to the next level.

Setting aside that much land and water for conservation will ultimately destroy food production and regional economies.

It will mean a massive expansion of national parks, marine exclusion zones, wildlife refuges, wilderness areas, conservation easements, rural road and stock route closures and Indigenous Protected Areas.

Eventually, all human activity will simply be removed from these areas, including stock grazing, mining, timber production and all forms of recreational and Indigenous land use.

That’s something seldom mentioned.  Indigenous land use.

For 30 by 30 to work, the government will need Australia’s Traditional Land-owners to surrender all rights to access and use of the land held in their name.

This dispossession of Indigenous rights has been hidden behind endless platitudes about “treaties”, “conservation management agreements” and letting them “have a say” in what is happening, but the sub-text is clear.

30 by 30’s goal will restrict ALL human access to the land and waterways – and not just ‘whitey’.

That’s why Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, more than anyone else, should be raising hell about 30 by 30.

All the platitudes, treaties and ‘compensations’ in the world, will be nothing beside the permanent loss of their sovereign right to roam over and use the land itself.

The roots of 30 by 30 lie in a radical green agenda called the “Wildlands Project”, from the 1990s.

The Project’s goal is to move humans into highly controlled, and restrictive ‘human settlement zones’, leaving most of the continent off limits.

It’s a ‘bait and switch’ aimed at removing people’s private property rights and placing control in the hands of an elite band of unelected technocrats, NGOs and their billionaire sugar daddies.

All done by stealth using the old Fabian tactic of ‘step-change’.

Once 2030 rolls around, much harsher ‘targets’ will be set for 2040 and 2050.

Each benchmark geared towards gently easing the human race into perpetual serfdom.


Last week the UN found Australia ‘guilty’ of having violated the human rights of Torres Strait Islanders, due to climate inaction.

The UN’ Human Rights Committee ruled that Australia had failed to take adequate action to cut emissions or adopt adaptation measures to protect the islands.  It also said the country should “compensate the Islanders for harm suffered, … and TAKE MEASURES TO CONTINUE TO SECURE THE COMMUNITIES’ SAFE EXISTENCE”.

The Torres Strait Islanders were represented by the wealthy UK environmental group, ‘ClientEarth’, funded by wealthy billionaire Winsome McIntosh, of the A&T supermarket chain.

The Torres Strait Islanders’ case was the first climate change litigation brought by inhabitants of low-lying islands against a nation state.

As ClientEarth lawyer, Sophie Marjanac, commented:

“This case opens the door for further legal actions and compensation claims by other climate affected people, and will give hope to those fighting for loss and damage at this year’s international climate talks in Egypt”.

However, those “climate affected people” should think twice about taking advantage of the ‘landmark’ ruling.

It is little more than a ‘stalking horse’ for rich nations to use a ‘human rights argument’ justifying the declaration of a state of emergency over small islands and the forced relocation of their populations.

The 3rd National Climate Assessment states: “As sea level raises faster and coastal storms, erosion, and inundation cause more frequent or widespread threats, relocation (also called managed retreat or realignment), … will become a more pressing option”.

A 2021 paper by “Young Australians in International Affairs” is just one of many published the last few years calling for first world states to pro-actively assist in moving the Islands’ “affected populations”.

The UN’s Torres Strait ruling provides the perfect legal basis for them to do so.

After all, it instructs Australia to “take measures to continue to secure the communities’ safe existence”.

It will start gradually with the relocation of people from small, low lying coral atolls, most subject to sand erosion and king tides, but it won’t end there.

Eventually, ALL small and remote islands will be designated “at risk” from climate change.

That’s why Islanders everywhere, need to be very, very careful how they respond when these slick-talking, wealthy European NGOs come knocking at their door.

They might say they want to help but believe me, their idea of “helping” masks a different agenda altogether.

One that ends with the loss of the Islanders’ homeland, way of life, culture and heritage.


The United Nations has called for a worldwide crackdown on “conspiracy theorists”.

They are even telling people to police friends, family and fellow citizens for signs of ‘thought crimes’, and take action!

As one Canadian politician said:

“The UN has put out a framework for people to assess and ultimately undermine the legitimate questions that people everywhere are asking about their governments by smearing such questions as ‘conspiracy theories'”.

The goal is to get people to stop questioning their governments or holding them to account.

It’s “textbook gaslighting”.

My question for the UN is:

If there’s no conspiracy, why are governments worldwide implementing all the same policies, passing all the same laws and mouthing all the same talking points?

“Build Back Better” anyone?

The real reason the UN is ‘gaslighting’ you is because they, and the whole globalist cabal, are running scared.

None of them ever expected to see such a tidal wave of protests sweeping the world or for ordinary people to start waking up and demanding as to what the hell is going on!

I might add:

It’s NOT a ‘conspiracy theory’ when someone tells you over and over again, they are planning to “transform”, “transition” and “reset” the whole world and the lives of everyone in it!

Or that we should we need to prepare ourselves for a dystopian “new normal” future where we are watched 24/7 and ‘own nothing’ blah, blah, blah.

I won’t even mention the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” and the man-machine hybrid rubbish WEF and Klaus Schwab keep rabbiting on about.

And here’s an idea.

If there’s no ‘global government’ conspiracy, then maybe don’t go around calling yourselves things like:

Agenda for the 21st Century; Coalition for a New Economy; the New Economic Order; the Global Finance Initiative; UN Global Compact; Global Digital Transformation’ UN75: 2020 and Beyond; Global Roadmap for Digital Cooperation; Global Resettlement Deployment Scheme; Global Transition Taskforce or the Global Transformation Project.

Just saying …

As far as I’m concerned, this new “Think Before Sharing” campaign, just proves that the REAL enemy the UN wants to put down, isn’t ‘misinformation’ – it’s YOU! The citizen.

And every citizen like you.

Democratic governments should be forced to answer uncomfortable questions and held to account by their people.

Questions like:

Why on earth are we STILL living under ‘STATE OF EMERGENCY’ laws?

Until someone gives me a straight answer to that question, I reserve my right to SPECULATE!

And so should you!


Video Start – 11:55

Klaus Schwab’s life by subscription, quote, is really serfdom. It’s slavery. Billionaire globalist corporations will own everything, homes, factories, farms, cars, furniture, and everyday citizens will rent what they need if their social credit score allows.

The plan of the Great Reset is that you will die with nothing. To pull off this evil plan, Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum will need to take more than just material possessions from Australians. Senators in this very chamber today who support the Great Reset threaten our privacy, freedom, and dignity. Yes, they’re in this senate chamber.

One Nation vehemently opposes the Great Reset, the Digital Identity Bill, theft of agricultural land use forcing farmers off their land, and all of the Great Reset. One Nation has a comprehensive plan to bring our beautiful country back to sustainable prosperity. And in the months ahead, we will be rolling that plan out. Instead of Lib-Lab pushing Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset with the tagline, you will own nothing and be happy.


Malcolm nails it again!
“We stand for a world where individuals and their communities have primacy over globalist billionaires and their quisling bureaucrats, politicians and mouthpiece media”!!
The world’s globalists, self-appointed rulers of planet Earth, have decreed a ‘Great Reset’.
But they all forgot one tiny thing …

One Nation advocates the Great Resist.

We stand for a world where individuals and communities have primacy over predatory globalist billionaires and their quisling bureaucrats, politicians, and mouthpiece media. One Nation accepts the challenge to provide a better future for everyday Australians.

We have one flag, we are one community, and we are One Nation.



Please sign and share the E-Petition:



Brilliant news out of Geneva today!

As most of you know, the World Health Assembly has spent the past 7 days considering Biden’s 13 controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations.

Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, UK and the US, spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.

The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists’ way, came on Wednesday, the 25th of May, which just happened to also be Africa Day.

Botswana read a statement on behalf of its 47 AFRO members, saying they would be collectively withholding their support for the ‘reforms’, which many African members were very concerned about.

Multiple other countries also said they had reservations over the changes and would not be supporting them either.

These included Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran and Malaysia.

Brazil in particular said it would exit WHO altogether, rather than allow its population to be made subject to the new amendments.

In the end, the WHO and its wealthy nation supporters, were forced to back down.

They have not given up though – far from it.

Instead, they did what they always do and ‘pivoted’.

At their request, a new working group was convened to make “technical recommendations on the proposed amendments” which will re-submitted along with the Pandemic Treaty, at the 77th Health Assembly meeting in 2024.

There has also been lots of pushback from Republicans in the US, with a number of them introducing new bills giving the US Congress/Senate powers to override any WHO mandates or directives issued as part of any International agreements.

One, called the ‘No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act’, has 15 co-sponsors and was introduced to the Senate on Thursday by Republican Senator Ron Johnson, who said “The sovereignty of the United States is not negotiable”.

Here in Australia, we need to keep the pressure up on our own parliaments, both Federal AND State.

I urge everyone who has not already done so, to sign and share my Queensland Parliament Petition on the IHR Amendments and Pandemic Treaty (link below).

Please sign and share the E-Petition:



#AfricaStandsUp  #StopTheTreaty  #StopTheWho


The WHO is making a power grab over Australian sovereignty this weekend in Geneva.

Australians were NEVER told that this was happening, until TODAY!

Both the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader were caught RED-HANDED today when  confronted by the media for the first time at separate press conferences.

Albanese looked like a deer in the headlights, mumbled something about being a big WHO supporter, then scuttled away.

Morrison, meanwhile, is made of sterner stuff, decided to bluff his way through, waxing lyrical on how the whole thing was just the most brilliant idea.

If it was so brilliant, PM, why did neither you or your Ministers think, even once, to alert the Australian people on what you were planning to do behind closed doors?


Click here to watch Scott Morrison and Anthony Albanese SIGN AWAY YOUR SOVEREIGNTY



Turns out things are far worse than I realised.

The REAL POWER PLAY that will put national decision-making powers in the hands of WHO, is set to take place on 22 May 2022, when the world’s governments all sign off on the Biden Administration’s proposed Amendments to the International Health Regulations in Geneva.

The Amendments are described as “complementary”, but separate to the proposed Treaty.

Like the Treaty, however, they will be “legally binding and enforceable” under international law.

More alarming, however, is that they are the primary instrument through which national sovereignty is to be ceded to the WHO, and the globalist funders who pull its strings.

Funders that include the Chinese Government and billionaire entities like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and George Soros.

Michele Bachmann, Dean of the Robertson School of Government and a former U.S. Congresswoman, has rung the alarm bells in the US, saying it is: “the most dangerous power grab by an unaccountable organisation in history”.

Once the amendments are signed, she warns America, WHO technocrats will have the authority to intervene in the policies and laws of “any nation in the world without its permission.”

Chinese-style lockdowns (which WHO has NEVER criticised or condemned) could be mandated “for whatever pretext they want, they don’t have to show data, they could do this”, Bachmann said.

Why is there almost no public discussion or debate on this issue in Australia?

The amendments were presented to the World Health Organisation by Biden on 18 January 2022, but there is NOTHING about them from before mid April – and even that’s only in the alternative news outlets.

Biden has released a list of countries who he says have agreed to sign away the constitutional rights of their people.  AUSTRALIA is top of the list!

Was this the REAL reason world governments suddenly, and ‘in lockstep’, toned down their previously harsh rhetoric on the virus, and even lifted many of their restrictions and mandates?

Was it all just to lull people into a false sense of security?

Anyone who cares about this country and future generations, needs to drop everything right now and focus on this ONE issue.

We only have three working days to turn things around!

An unequivocal message needs to be sent to every member of our UNI-POLAR Government in Canberra, including the wolf-in-sheep’s clothing GREENS Party, that under NO circumstances are these Amendments to be signed before there has been a full public debate and, more importantly, A NATIONAL REFERENDUM.

More to come….



Last month, while most people were distracted by rising inflation, food shortages and events in the Ukraine, the latest round of WHO’s hearings on the “Pandemic Treaty” took place in Geneva.

The next round of talks are due to start mid-June, with a working draft to be ready for “internal negotiations” by 1 August 2022.

The Treaty is expected to be ratified by 194 countries and become fully binding under international law by no later than May 2024.

To date, only ONE country has lodged a “rejection letter” with the WHO, and that’s Russia.

Any government that signs this Treaty, will have effectively signed away their country’s sovereignty, without the full knowledge or informed consent of its people.

The Treaty hands WHO supranational powers, including the right to decide what a pandemic is, declare a state of emergency on a nation’s behalf, and determine what measures should be taken in responding to it.

Bear in mind that, according to “experts”, a “pandemic” can have any number of meanings nowadays.  According to them, there can be pandemics of heart disease, obesity, cancer and even poverty.

Draft clauses grant WHO a vast array of compliance powers, including harsh financial sanctions, enforced by the UN and a newly created body housed within the World Bank called the Global Health Security Financial Intermediary Fund.

The drafters will also be mandating huge increases in ‘COMPULSORY’ financing of WHO, which member states can raise by imposing new public health taxes on their citizens.

Other clauses allow WHO to put a country under a ‘state of emergency’ PREVENTATIVELY, for which the dreaded ‘precautionary principle’ is being trotted out.

Like ‘pre-crime’ for pandemics.

It will mean an emergency can be declared, and lockdowns imposed, in countries where not a single case has been identified.

The Treaty puts unparalleled powers into the hands of a few unelected foreign bureaucrats, allowing them to make “unaccountable” decisions which override the decisions of a country’s national, state and local governments.

Here’s what that looks like – say our parliament passed a law banning mandatory vaccination – the Treaty gives WHO technocrats the power to overrule the law and force the jab on Australians anyway.

All of which makes the passing of Australia’s Defence Legislation Amendment (Enhancement of Defence Force Response to Emergencies) Bill in 2020, even more reprehensible.

By passing such laws, Parliament placed Australians in enormous danger.

Danger that could one day put heavily armed men outside their front doors during a WHO imposed ‘state of emergency’.

Men who don’t answer to the Australian people OR their Parliament.

#StopTheTreaty #SaveOurSovereignty


In order to achieve ‘Net Zero’ by 2050, Australian governments will have to basically demolish Australia’s existing economy and replace it with something entirely new.

The ‘Net Zero’ Agenda is not just some ‘feel good’ pledge.  It is a detailed, target-driven program for radical change that will permanently alter the way Australians work, play and do business.

With zero public consultation, debate, referendum or plebiscite, Scomo signed away the sovereignty and prospects of his country, its people and future generations.

Zero Carbon will be the end of fossil fuels, oil, coal and gas for starters.

All will need to be phased out with severe restrictions placed on any form of mining, agriculture, transport, tourism or industrial production.

The days of ‘petrol’ cars will be numbered as trillions of dollars are poured into constructing acres of low-income, high-density housing and creating artificial ‘green spaces’ and ‘work hubs’, all within walking distance of where you live.

When the UN said ‘go local’, they meant it.

The Morrison Government would have you believe that all this will be done through “breakthrough technology not taxes”.  Don’t you believe it.

A carbon tax of one form or another is a 100% certainty.

Even Labor’s Joel Fitzgibbons admitted as much at his press conference on Wednesday.

How else will people be forced into accepting Electric Vehicles or the ‘transformation’ of an electricity grid, once the cheapest and most reliable in the world, into one where rationing and blackouts are the norm.

Traditional energy-intensive industries like transport, agriculture, steel, glass production, chemicals, paper and cement manufacturing, will face soaring costs leading to shutdowns or offshoring and the consequent loss of millions of skilled jobs.

Australia will be taken backwards to a neo-feudal, wood-burning dystopia where its beautiful outback is infested with miles upon miles of toxic solar panels and windmills.

Absolutely nothing about these radical changes will be either ‘voluntary’ or ‘optional’.

Every ‘Net Zero’ document makes constant reference to the huge amount of ‘behaviour changes’ that will be needed to get countries to Net Zero.

Ultimately it will mean no more drives in the country, no more motorsports, boating, 4WD, trips to Bali, Fiji or anywhere, and no more ‘grey nomad’ caravan jaunts around Australia.

Even green leaders say that an “eco dictatorship” is going to be needed to enforce all the coming changes.

This means mandates, executive orders, border controls, restrictions on movements within designated human settlement zones, wholesale surveillance programs, green taxes, penalties, fees, plus endless new regulations and laws.

Lots of new laws.

It will be like lockdown, only permanent.