Why is everyone so sick and tired?

Human beings are fatter, sicker, more tired, more depressed, and less cognitively alert today, than at any other time in human history.
The rates for cancer, dementia, obesity, childhood diabetes, infertility and autoimmune conditions are skyrocketing.
Yet barely anyone within government or public health, seems the least bit interested in finding out why.
If pressed, you will hear a lot of vague references to ‘risk factors’, family history and, of course, ‘smoking’ – a factor that has become less and less convincing as the number of smokers plummets.
But most are simply not prepared to even speculate on the matter.
Instead, the focus is ALL on the best way to TREAT or MANAGE the condition, rather than find out what caused it in the first place.
For those of us old enough to remember Professor Sumner Miller’s popular catch cry of ‘WHY IS IT SO?’, this lack of curiosity is astonishing.
There are no peer-reviewed studies on the subject. No large foundations/institutes established, or government/billionaire grants set up, to investigate it, despite trillions being poured into all sorts of medical research over the past two decades.
It reminds me of ‘elite’ opinion’s lack of curiosity on the likely origins of Covid.
Even now, four years on, there is simply no appetite within government or the scientific community for getting to the bottom of it all.
And with the prospect – or so we are told– of more pandemics to come, where are all the public health campaigns promoting the health effects of fresh air, sunlight and exercise?
Or public health initiatives informing people about the health-giving effects of nutrients, vitamins, minerals, antioxidants and other natural ways people can help boost their immune response to infection and disease?
Instead, government public health campaigns seem more concerned with instilling fear and an overwhelming sense of individual powerlessness amongst the populace.
The damage this is doing to public health – and public trust – is incalculable.

Will there be any humans left when the Climate Apocalypse finally rocks up … ?

Men’s sperm counts have dropped over 50 percent since the early 1970s.

Over 50 percent!!

The trend was first identified in 1992 by Danish researchers who carried out the first major analysis of sperm counts in men between 1940 and 1990.

The team found that men’s sperm counts had dropped from 113 million/ml in 1940 to 66 million/ml in 1990 (virtually halved), with semen quality decreasing 25 percent.

This means a young male today; has only half the sperm count of his grandfather and therefore half the chance to conceive.

In 1995 French researchers analysed the records for 1300 healthy men at a Paris sperm bank and found average sperm counts had declined by a third between 1973 and 1993.

“There has been a true decline in the quality of semen during the past 20 years, since the characteristics of semen from a fertile man of a given age in 1993 are significantly poorer than those of a fertile man of the same age in 1973”.

A 2017 meta-analysis by researchers at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem found that from 1973 to 2011, sperm concentration had decreased 52.4 percent and total sperm count, 59.3 percent– a decline of 1.6 percent per year.

In November 2022, a new study was published in the Journal of Human Reproduction which showed the trend was global and accelerating, with an annual decline of 2.64% since 2000 – an “overall fall of 62.3% among unselected men”.

Men’s testosterone levels are also plummeting.

Testosterone in men has dropped 1% every year since 1987, according to a 2017 meta-analysis.

It’s not age-related either.

The study showed that an average 40 year old man in 2017 had testosterone levels 30% lower than the average 40 year old in 1987.

All these numbers paint a pretty stark picture for humanity’s future.

You would think someone, somewhere might want to find out why all this is happening.  But you’d be wrong.

The issue is routinely ignored by our political and media establishment.

Nor is it of interest to the world’s trillion-dollar scientific research/industrial complex.

I couldn’t find a single funded study, by NIH or anyone, on WHY testosterone and sperm counts are plummeting, much less how to stop it.

Why not?

It is an issue which could prove absolutely catastrophic for human propagation.

As Dr Shanna Swan, co-author of the 2017 Israeli study, said recently:

“If this trend continues, humans may not have the ability to reproduce themselves naturally by 2050”.

… may not have the ability to reproduce themselves NATURALLY by 2050.


I think I may have just answered my own question!


The Scottish government has ordered an inquiry into neonatal deaths, after official data showed newborn babies have been dying at a higher rate than expected in Scotland.

Scotland is one of the few countries in the world that actually collects good data and makes it public, unlike Australia for example.

Official data in Scotland shows a significant increase in neonatal mortality in Scotland throughout 2021 and 2022.

Two particular spikes over six months were noted.

In September 2021, the rate was 4.9 per thousand and in March 2022, it was 4.6.

Bear in mind that the average mortality rate amongst newborns is two per thousand births.

Public health authorities in Scotland have described the deaths as “troubling” but have been quick to rule out both Covid and the jab.

Which is curious because Public Health Scotland has admitted that NO statistics have been collected on whether the babies’ mothers had been injected or not.

PHS said its consultants had “given careful consideration to the potential benefits of including data on vaccination status as part of their inquiry into the tragic death of 39 infants in Scotland but decided against it, describing it as “uninformative for public health decision-making”!!

According to a document released under FOI, PHS wrote “we do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status as there is no Public Health reason to do so”!

Another report on newborn deaths in the UK’s Telegraph is headed:

“NHS Hospitals have claimed that babies born alive were stillborn.”

Some of the children lived for any from a few minutes up to five days.

At present coroners can only hold inquests for babies who have shown signs of life after being born.

In the UK, the coroner has no jurisdiction to investigate stillbirths, so if a baby is listed as stillborn, it is outside the protectorate of the coronial system.

Recording babies that were born alive, if only for a few hours or days, as stillbirths, has led to NHS officials being accused of trying to avoid scrutiny.

The question is “Why?”


I’m sure everyone’s seen the Atlantic article by now, where Browns University Professor, Emily Oster, argues the case for a ‘Pandemic Amnesty’, saying it’s time to “forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about Covid”.

Her argument rests on the ludicrous claim that those baying for the blood of our modern day ‘refuseniks’, ‘couldn’t possibly’ have known any different at the time.

The ‘refuseniks’, she admits, turned out to be right, but only as a “matter of luck”.

Oster herself, of course, belonged to the side cheering on every tyrannical measure and petty cruelty imaginable, shaming those who took principled stands as “Covidiots”, and mocking the deaths of the unvaccinated – just “to make sure that the lessons of these teachable moments are heard”, as the LA Times put it with insufferable smugness.

What public health authorities and politicians did in this country was particularly despicable.

I won’t list their many ‘crimes’ here, but those who suffered from them, know exactly how unforgivable they were.

Extreme measures were imposed that were never justified by either the data or common sense.  Those responsible, did so knowing full well that their actions would destroy the lives, businesses, happiness and well-being of millions.

Which is what happened.

You can’t just shut down society without causing catastrophic damage to people’s health, finances, social relations, education and a lot more.

Churches were shut, schools closed, borders barricaded, people detained at home and businesses shuttered.  Draconian restrictions and penalties imposed and all our constitutional and common law rights, trashed beyond repair.

It’s been nearly three years of hell.

And now we are left to deal with the fallout: business and career losses, family breakdowns, suicide, bitter social divisions, economic collapse, supply chain chaos, soaring inflation, threat of nuclear war, and a complete meltdown of the social fabric and public trust.

Politicians and bureaucrats single-handedly turned a manageable pandemic into an apocalyptic nightmare from which our society may never recover.

They failed at their jobs and as human beings.

In this case “getting something wrong”, as Oster puts it, actually WAS a “moral failing”.

And yet there is still no inquiry, no apology, no accountability and no act of atonement.

We are simply told to let bygones be bygones because they “didn’t know”.

“We didn’t know” wasn’t an acceptable excuse in Germany of 1945 and it’s not acceptable today.

Amnesty for the perpetrators?

Hell No!

#noamnesty #emilyoster


Soaring ‘excess death’ rates is a REAL phenomenon and it’s happening worldwide.

Last week, the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released updated figures showing that between 1 January to 31 July 2022, excess deaths were 17.3 percent above the historic average.

That’s a staggeringly high increase for a country like Australia.

In Spain, excess deaths have surged 37 percent in 2022, while in Cyprus deaths are 32.9 percent above average.  Portugal reported a 28.8 percent rate, Malta 26.4 percent and Italy, 24.9 percent.

In England and Wales, high numbers of excess deaths have been recorded every week for the past 26 weeks, bringing the grand total of excess deaths to nearly 29,491 since the week ending 24 April.

The latest ONS data for the week ending 14 October, shows there were 1,608 excess deaths for that week alone.

Of those 1,608 excess deaths, only 35% were attributable to Covid-19.

That’s a 15.9 percent increase in excess deaths against the five year average (2016-2019 + 2021).

The actual number is probably much higher, given that the five-year average includes 2021: a year when excess deaths were also significantly higher than normal.

Scottish authorities have also reported a huge uptick in unexpected deaths for 2022, with emergency admissions for heart problems increasing by over 25,000.

Yesterday, The Scotland Herald reported that the country’s health chiefs are in talks with funeral directors to ensure cremations and burials can keep pace with demand in the event of “significant excess deaths” this winter.

Board papers from NHS Lanarkshire also note that additional mortuary capacity, created during the height of the pandemic, may be called upon to cope with a potential surge in excess mortality over coming months.

In the US, official data shows a cumulative total of over 17,000 excess deaths amongst young people aged between 0 and 24 years old.

Similarly, 20 to 30 excess deaths of 0 to 24 year olds are being recorded every week in the UK.

The complete lack of interest in these alarming trends by government or the mainstream media is simply astonishing.

We’re talking about many, many more deaths than would normally be expected.

There needs to be a full inquiry into this!

And I’m not talking about some bogus attempt by globalist shills to blame the whole thing on “climate change”, as happened in the UK recently, either!!

I mean a proper, independent investigation into what is causing all these extra deaths.

If that means carrying out large-scale post-mortem studies, then so-be-it.  Those resources should be made available immediately.





QCCL President, Michael Cope, made a bracing stand for ‘common sense’ at last week’s Committee hearing on the Government’s Public Health and Other Legislation (Extension of Expiring Provisions) Amendment Bill 2022.

The new bill seeks to extend a number of the Chief Health Officer’s extraordinary powers for another year.

As Mr Cope points out, by the time the new Sunset date rolls round, Queenslanders will have been living under emergency laws for 4 years, which is simply not acceptable in a “free society”.

The new Bill is being sold as a more ‘streamlined’, ‘step-down’ approach to exiting the current state of emergency in Queensland.

Queensland’s Civil Liberties’ Council chief, however, was having none of it.

Mr Cope pointed out that with the availability of ‘safe and effective’ vaccines and anti-virals there was no longer ANY reason for these emergency powers to be retained past their current expiry date of 31 October 2022.

According to QCCL, the emergency situation used to justify the granting of these extraordinary powers of the CHO in the first place, no longer exists.

In a written submission on the Bill, the Council said it was concerned this “long-term intervention into the lives of Queenslanders to micromanage them”, was becoming a “norm changing arrangement”.

In a news blog earlier this year, QCCL referenced the raft of anti-terrorism laws Australian parliaments had passed in the wake of the 9/11 attacks in 2001.

Most of those laws had also contained sunset clauses and these had all been extended again and again, with the most recent extension passed by the Commonwealth Parliament on 24 August 2021.

So 20 years on, not only are these anti-terrorism laws still in place, they are now being routinely extended without scrutiny or debate.

As QCCL notes:

“It is because of examples like this that the Council is not prepared to accept the assurances of the government that the current emergency will come to an end when the powers are no longer necessary”.

I couldn’t agree more!



(Note the visuals on it start after a minute or two)


We are seeing some pretty catastrophic drop-offs in the number of ‘live births’ worldwide in 2022.

Some of the biggest drops in the first quarter included:

23 percent in Taiwan;

20 percent in Mongolia;

14 percent in Germany;

13 percent in Estonia; and

11 percent in Hungary and Finland.

Similar rates are being reported in countries like Ireland, Japan, Switzerland, Portugal and Norway.

In the UK, live births fell 6 percent in January; 9 percent in February; 13.2 percent in March; 13 percent in April and 14 percent in May.

Canada and Australia keep a tight lid on up-to-date statistics on anything so it’s hard to get the ‘live birth’ data for either of them.

In Canada however, British Columbia recently posted figures showing ‘live births’ there fell 4 percent in February, 7 percent in March, 10 percent in April , 10 percent in May and a whopping 15 percent in June.

The numbers show that this is no blip with declines increasing, month over month.

What is going on?

Are women simply choosing to avoid pregnancy or is there something else happening?

At least one contributing factor may be the delayed effect of ‘lockdowns’ last year, although it wouldn’t account for the extraordinary size of the falls.

Also, Sweden’s population were never put under lockdown and yet ‘live births’ are plummeting there as well.

The fact is, falls like we’re seeing should NOT be happening.

Birth Graphs are generally very steady.  You could take graphs over 10 years and you would see numbers all parallel each other pretty closely, aside from a natural variation rate of between 1 and 2 percent, possibly 3.

Drops of 15 percent are simply unheard of.

Something horrifying is going on.

If the next quarter of 2022 mirrors the first, the world could be entering ‘Children of Men’ territory.

Dr. Anthony Fauci “12 Years after vaccine all hell breaks loose”



New legislation proposing a ‘step-down’ approach to the current emergency powers framework in Queensland, was introduced to Parliament on 1 September.

The Bill has been forwarded to the Health Committee for review by the 14th of October 2022.


The new Bill seeks to replace the current emergency framework with a new set of “temporary and targeted powers”, which would allow the Chief Health Office to only issue public health directions across a few key areas.

Those directions could only be issued if the CHO believed it was “reasonably necessary” to:

  • respond to a “serious risk” to the public health system or community;
  • give effect to a National Cabinet decision; or
  • give effect to advice from national advisory bodies (eg. AHPPC).

Many people, I know, feel fairly strongly that this ongoing use of emergency powers in Queensland is unnecessary and that the whole lot should be allowed to expire on 31 October 2022 as they are supposed to.

I tend to agree.

I also believe that such powers should ONLY be exercised by a Minister, who is a democratically elected representative of the people, who is ACCOUNTABLE to the people for all actions taken.

The CHO is none of these things – neither elected OR accountable.

There is also an issue with a few broadly worded phrases, like “serious risk” that have not been defined in the Bill – the meaning is left entirely up to CHO’s own discretion.

I am also concerned with the Bill’s proposal to extend emergency power provisions at corrective services facilities for another year.

Apart from that, I find the virtual silence on the introduction of the Bill, both in the mainstream media and elsewhere, very strange.

The Departmental Briefing Paper states:

“A CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION paper about the proposed changes to the Chief Health Officer’s powers .. was distributed to targeted stakeholders”

That sounds suspiciously like stakeholders consulted on the Bill are being prevented by the Government from discussing the contents of the Bill, either publicly or with their membership.

If so, that’s disgraceful.

This is a significant issue and there should be a wide-ranging and open public debate on how the State steps away from the ongoing state of emergency powers framework.

We all saw the storm of controversy that erupted when The Australian revealed the shroud of secrecy governing the Queensland Government’s consultations regarding proposed new environmental laws.

Stakeholders were forced to sign an “unprecedented confidentiality deed before they were allowed to see proposed amendments”.

The Deed prevented stakeholders from discussing any of the proposals, either publicly or with members.

I sincerely hope the same tactics weren’t used here.



The committee invites submissions addressing any aspect of the Bill, from all interested parties.  Guidelines for making a submission to a parliamentary committee are available here:  Guide to making a submission. Please ensure your submission meets these requirements.

Click here to make an online submission.  The closing date for written submissions is 9am on Friday 16 September 2022.

Submissions may also be emailed to:


Committee Secretary
Health and Environment Committee

Submissions should include:

  • the author’s name and signature
  • if the submission is made on behalf of an organisation, the level of approval (e.g. a local branch, executive committee or national organisation)
  • mailing address (and email if available), and
  • daytime telephone number.

Please ensure your submission includes the above or it may not be considered by the committee.


The committee has scheduled a public briefing on the Bill by officers of the Department of Health on Wednesday 28 September 2022, commencing at 9am.


The committee has scheduled a public hearing on the Bill for Wednesday 28 September 2022, commencing at 10am.  Further information will be published here in due course.


The committee is due to table its report on Friday, 14 October 2022. The report will be published here.


Submissions close: 9am on Friday, 16 September 2022
Public Briefing: 9am on Wednesday, 28 September 2022
Public Hearing: 10am on Wednesday, 28 September 2022
Report Due Date: Friday, 14 October 2022


According to Britain’s Office of National Statistics (ONS), the official unvaccinated rate is 8 percent, a very low number.

Whether this number is accurate, however, is becoming increasingly open to question in the UK.

It started with the release of the latest UK Health Security Agency Report in July.

As one critic tweeted at the time: “the report reveals that almost 30 percent of those eligible in the UK, have not had a single dose of the vaccine.  Even if you take out those aged under 18, you still have 20 percent without a single dose.”

Now a controversial BBC2 documentary called “Unvaccinated”, hosted by mathematician Hannah Fry, is raising more eyebrows.

In the documentary, Fry refers to the fact that the BBC had commissioned the largest UK-wide representative survey, since the vaccine rollout began, for the program.

The BBC survey included 2570 people, of whom 664 said they had never been vaccinated – that’s 26 PERCENT!

The anomaly was picked up by Norman Fenton, Professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary London University and a Research Fellow of The Alan Turing Institute, who said that with such a large and representative survey sample: “it would be virtually impossible, by any kind of statistical analysis, for the true proportion of unvaccinated to be anything less than 20 percent”.

Fenton downloaded the survey data and examined it in detail against the “nationally representative profile” based on ONS census data.

He found that it all matched pretty closely and was therefore stunned to find the company had made a big ‘weighting’ adjustment to the “net unvaccinated” figure.

“This reduced those 664 responses to just 216” he said.

“Which is completely insane.  It doesn’t make any sense whatsoever”.

“When you scroll back, you can see that all the counts are adjusted based on that weighted difference, changing the percentage from 26 to 8 percent.”

“It’s pretty safe to conclude that the ONS claim of 8 percent massively underestimates the actual number, and the true rate is probably at least 20 percent” he said.

Why does it matter?

It matters because all of the “safety and efficacy” studies were carried out on the presumption that the official ONS figure was accurate.

If ONS has massively overestimated the “vaccinated” rate, he said, then all those “safety and efficacy” studies were done on flawed data.

It would also mean that the “fatality rate” for the “unvaccinated” compared to “vaccinated”, has also been massively overestimated.


According to the latest official data, ‘excess deaths’ are skyrocketing worldwide.

Whether its New Zealand, Australia, Germany, Netherlands, Scotland or United Kingdom, “excess deaths” in 2022 are between 10 to 20 percent and heading northwards.

Australia boasts one of the worst “excess deaths” rate in the world at 16.6 percent above the national average.

Just for context, actuaries allow 2 to 3 percent variation for deaths in any given year, so an increase of 16.6 percent is staggering.

The UK’s Office of National Statistics recently showed there were 12,333 deaths for the week ending 26 August 2022 – an increase of 15.4 percent.

That’s 1,646 “excess deaths” in one week.

Alberta, Canada, reports the leading cause of death for 2022 in Alberta, is not cancer or dementia, but “unknown causes”.

In 2019, there were 500 deaths “from unknown causes” in Alberta. Two years later, its 3,500.

Eurostat figures for the EU show similar trends.

European countries with the worst ‘excess death’ rates include Germany (14 percent), Estonia (15 percent), Spain (16.7 percent) and Portugal (23.9 percent).

Professor Carl Heneghan, Director of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University compared the excess death rate from April to August 2022, with the seven-year average revealing a substantial increase in ‘excess deaths’ everywhere.

His figures also show an astounding 28 percent increase in the number of people dying “at home” in England and Wales.

The Professor is calling for a thorough investigation to be carried out on all these deaths:

“The signals in the data suggest something is not right” he said.

“Sustained rises in deaths should trigger an investigation”.  This should involve “accessing the raw data on death certificates, medical notes and analysing autopsy reports”.

“I feel there is a lack of clear thinking at the moment but, when it comes to people’s health and well-being, you can’t wait – it’s unacceptable”.

Mainstream educator, Dr John Campbell, has strongly criticised the publicly available deaths-data, describing it as “simply not acceptable”.

“We really have to get to the bottom of this” he said.

“It’s an international scandal.  There are very high death rates around the world and people need to know what’s going on.  At the moment we’re not getting the full information we need.”

It doesn’t matter where you look or which expert you listen to, one thing is certain – a lot more people than normal are dying.

It’s an undeniable fact.

And here’s the thing.  It’s across every age group.

People in the prime of their lives are dying at unprecedented rates.

Most shocking of all, however, is that nobody in government or the mainstream media seems the least bit interested in finding out why.