ONE NATION HAS A PLAN FOR A BETTER AUSTRALIA

Video Start – 11:55

Klaus Schwab’s life by subscription, quote, is really serfdom. It’s slavery. Billionaire globalist corporations will own everything, homes, factories, farms, cars, furniture, and everyday citizens will rent what they need if their social credit score allows.

The plan of the Great Reset is that you will die with nothing. To pull off this evil plan, Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum will need to take more than just material possessions from Australians. Senators in this very chamber today who support the Great Reset threaten our privacy, freedom, and dignity. Yes, they’re in this senate chamber.

One Nation vehemently opposes the Great Reset, the Digital Identity Bill, theft of agricultural land use forcing farmers off their land, and all of the Great Reset. One Nation has a comprehensive plan to bring our beautiful country back to sustainable prosperity. And in the months ahead, we will be rolling that plan out. Instead of Lib-Lab pushing Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset with the tagline, you will own nothing and be happy.

THE GREAT RESIST!!

Malcolm nails it again!
“We stand for a world where individuals and their communities have primacy over globalist billionaires and their quisling bureaucrats, politicians and mouthpiece media”!!
The world’s globalists, self-appointed rulers of planet Earth, have decreed a ‘Great Reset’.
But they all forgot one tiny thing …
“WE ARE MANY and THEY ARE FEW”!

One Nation advocates the Great Resist.

We stand for a world where individuals and communities have primacy over predatory globalist billionaires and their quisling bureaucrats, politicians, and mouthpiece media. One Nation accepts the challenge to provide a better future for everyday Australians.

We have one flag, we are one community, and we are One Nation.

“WHO DOES NOT OBEY, SHALL NOT EAT”

I came across a great quote in an old Queensland Hansard debate from 1970 the other day.

It is from Leon Trotsky and says:

“In a country where the sole employer is the State, opposition means death by slow starvation.  The old principle of ‘Who does not work shall not eat’ is replaced by a new one:

“WHO DOES NOT OBEY, SHALL NOT EAT”.

Interestingly, the Queensland MP quoting Trotsky is Charles Porter, Grandfather of Australia’s former Attorney General, Christian Porter.

“Make no mistake” he told the House.

“When members opposite attack … a competitive, free-enterprise economy, they are attacking political freedom as well.

WE ON THIS SIDE BELIEVE IN THE FREEDOM OF THE MANY FROM RIGID CONTROL BY THE FEW ON TOP.

We believe in competition and free enterprise.

We believe in due rewards for energy, imagination and risk-taking.

We agree with the author Harry Emerson Fosdick, who said~ “Democracy is based upon the conviction that there are extraordinary possibilities in ordinary people.”

To me, that is the basis of true democracy.

NOT THE NOTION THAT THE GREAT MASS OF PEOPLE ARE STUPID, FOOLISH AND CHILDLIKE, AND MUST BE CONTROLLED BY THE SUPER-EXPERTS UP ON TOP.”

Great stuff!

IEA CALLS FOR CLIMATE LOCKDOWNS

From the beginning, analogies were drawn between Covid and Climate Change which I found alarming.

Green groups and their billionaire funders are known for their strongly autocratic views.  Like all cultists they believe that they know better than anyone else what is best for humanity.

Imagine their joy, therefore, as governments worldwide rolled out a series of tyrannical new laws suspending the democratic process, locking people up in their homes, shutting down businesses, restricting road use and criminalising free speech.

Is it any wonder that those of us who tried to question the ‘reasonableness’ of these laws, were howled down and showered with abuse?

Is it any wonder that so many of them fought the end of lockdowns tooth and nail in 2020?

I mean it wasn’t as if such people actually gave a damn about human health.

No.  It was because they all knew a ‘golden opportunity’ when they saw one.

Right at the outset they understood instantly the precedent that ‘State of Emergency’ laws set when it came to fighting climate change – only their lockdowns would be a lot more permanent of course.

In their eyes, any government with the power to limit private-vehicle use, ration the consumption of meat, impose censorship, close businesses and lock people up, was a government they could really get behind.

Even global governing bodies like the WEF, OECD and IMF, issued broad hints that to achieve ‘net zero’ by 2050, governments may need some form of ‘climate lockdown’ laws.

Now, the International Energy Agency has ‘upped the ante’ by calling for governments worldwide to adopt ‘climate lockdowns’ on the basis that “net zero” won’t be possible unless people are forced to stay home as much as possible.

As the IEA’s “10-Point Plan to Cut Oil Use’ report states:

“Governments have all the necessary tools at their disposal to put oil demand into decline in the coming years, which would support efforts to both strengthen energy security and achieve vital climate goals”.

Proposals include:

“Reducing highway speed limits; more working from home; street changes to encourage walking and cycling; car-free Sundays in cities and restrictions on other days; cutting transit fares; policies that encourage more carpooling; cutting business air travel”.

Suddenly, Queensland’s refusal to lift its Emergency Powers laws last month, makes a lot more sense.

 

HAPPY DICTATORSHIP DAY, QUEENSLAND!

Today marks the 100th anniversary of the day Queensland’s Upper House ceased to exist.

It was abolished by Labor’s ‘Red Ted’ Theodore, against the clear will of the Queensland people, 61% of whom had voted against its abolition in a referendum held in 1917.

All of which counted for nothing with Labor, who simply set about achieving their ends by ‘other means’.

First, they installed a submissive Laborite as Governor and then proceeded to ‘stack’ the Legislative Council with ex-Labour functionaries – mostly union secretaries and party hacks.

Once they had the numbers, the Bill was rushed through both Houses before being signed off on by ‘their man’, the Governor.

As one Queensland editorial put it at the time, it was a “gross abuse of representative power”.

The Sydney Morning Herald went even further, describing the whole thing as “tyrannical trickery”, with Labor first “degrading and then destroying the House which was a real bulwark of popular right and political decency in the State”.

There is a long history of political philosophy and theory behind the argument that having two houses of parliament is preferable to one, particularly for protecting the separation of powers.

Without an upper house the Executive branch of government—the ministers, government departments and agencies—enjoy free reign to push through any agenda they choose and there is little anyone in Parliament can do about it.

It results, as a former UK Lord Chancellor famously put it, in an “elective dictatorship.”

Requiring laws to pass through and be debated in a second chamber by different parliamentarians with different viewpoints, and representing different regions ensures that proposed laws are subject to proper oversight and scrutiny.

It also ensures much better representation for sub-national or regional areas, which often have very different values and interests to urban jurisdictions.

Today, of the 93 seats in Queensland’s Legislative Assembly, 64, or 69%, are located in the South-East region.

Only 5 seats (5%) cover Far North Queensland, the Darling Downs and South West regions combined, six seats (6%) account for North Queensland and Wide Bay Burnett regions, 4 seats (4%) are in the Central Queensland region, and 3 seats (3%) represent the Mackay, Isaac, and Whitsunday region.

This has resulted in an inbuilt, structural bias towards the concerns and interests of the South-East corner.

Without an elected, proportional upper house, there can be no limits or check, on this dominance of the lower house by Queensland’s urban elites, at the clear expense of those living in regional areas.

When you put this numerical dominance in the context of the contemporary party system and the rigid discipline it exercises over its members, then a propensity for ‘groupthink’ and uniformity of opinion becomes inevitable.

An upper house which increases the overall size of parliament would give Queensland a much greater range of voices and a lot more scrutiny, accountability and public debate.

All of which has never been more needed than it is today.

JUSTIN TRUDEAU HAS STRAIGHT UP LOST THE PLOT!

Justin Trudeau over in Canada, is starting to look and sound more like an Eastern European dictator than the Prime Minister of a democracy.

He has now invoked Canada’s ‘War Measures’ powers to unilaterally freeze the bank accounts of anyone linked to the peaceful Convoy protests, without even bothering to go through the courts first.

He is also giving Canadian police “more tools” to imprison and fine dissenting Canadians, and to cancel the vehicle insurance of anyone connected with the demonstrators.

Demonstrators, mind you, who have protested peacefully and simply asked that their country be allowed to return to normal.

But it gets worse …

The increasingly unhinged PM has now BLOCKED all social media posts from inside Canada.

Users can post, but what they post WILL NOT APPEAR on any feeds anywhere if it comes from a Canadian IP address.

Some users have been able to get around the block by using Virtual Private Networks (VPN’s), but Trudeau is already working on a way to stop that as well.

This is what these faux “bleeding heart liberals” and Great Resetters are all about at the end of the day!  Outright tyranny.

As Malcolm X once said:

“Scratch a Liberal and you’ll find a Fascist”.

How right he was …

Click here to watch a brilliant interview with Trudeau’s brother worth watching
Also a link to the wonderful Canadian MP, Randy Hillier